The Paradox of Child Happiness

I used to believe disparities created unhappiness but travelling around the world, I kept noticing a counter-intuitive phenomenon over and over again:

No matter where you go, the happiest children will always be found in poverty and children born into privilege are invariably miserable, anxious and lonely.

As I was trying (failing) to buy happiness at the time, I became obsessed with figuring out the seemingly illogical nature of child happiness. I think I get it now; it's a function of (perceived) debts owed.

Children are happy in poverty because the world doesn't owe them anything. They're carefree as no one cares enough to make them suffer to please, keep up appearances, behave themselves, live up to expectations or reach their full potential. There's no obligation or pressure; in poverty they have nothing to lose so they live without fear. 

Unlike the children of privilege, slum kids are happy because they're more or less free. 

If my theory is correct, the way to ensure misery would be to lean on children to make them conform to some ostensible standard of successful behaviour, leading them to believe they're then entitled to what the world will never owe them. Make them suffer to please you and they'll spend their lives in angst, fuming at perceived insults and injustices, keeping markers, threatening payback, at war with a world they imagine is disrespecting them when the truth is, no one could possibly care. As the unpaid 'debts' mount, they'll be overwhelmed. Misery and conflict will be all they know. 

Elliot Rodger was led to believe he was entitled to what the world would never owe him. Someone misled him.

To ensure happiness, you'd simply tell children the truth: The world owes them nothing. They're not entitled to anything from their fellow humans. Life is what they choose to make of it. There is no fairness, justice or equality; any they receive is just a bonus. If allowed to respect themselves and treat themselves Right, children won't grow up imagining the world owes them unpaid debts, leaving them free to have fun instead.

The Last of the Humans

Nearly everyone is psychotic. Their thoughts and feelings are not in sync with reality. This is what happens when children are raised with lies and violence. 

---

Valuable Lies

Nothing I say can make people understand that their malicious lies aren't valuable. 

Women's Shame.

Women viciously shame sluts. It's going on literally non-stop. Men need to get involved because women are destroying girls. Fathers are useless, actual men are needed. Fathers are terrible, they're just part of the problem.

A girl cannot handle her own "barrier" so this isn't creepy at all.

The Problem is that women slut-shame honest girls (whores cannot compete with liberated women), but no one is shaming whores.

Men Don't Give Birth.

 

Evil Knows the Truth is Mean

This terrifying vermin species gets really creepy when compassionate.

Over 10,000 people have gone "Awwh" and given this story a Like or Share. Hundreds of comments celebrate the fictional boy's heroism. Until I commented, 100% of the comments praised the boy and scorned the old man. Zero people were correct. To begin with, the picture depicts animal cruelty.

Can dogs eat bread? 

YES, but only in SMALL portions and NOT on a regular basis. It is never a good idea to leave bread around where your dog can get it. Too much bread can expand your dog’s tummies and people food in general can build some pretty bad food habits in dogs. Some dogs might be allergic to wheat and other ingredients in bread so you would want to make sure that is not the case for your dog. 

Ignoring the irony of the picture, the story itself is classic Christian Compassionate evil gobbled up by broken Toddler minds. Naughty little Toddlers love appearing noble but hate actually helping people (their broken minds perceive life as a zero-sum game where advantage to others disadvantages them, and vice-versa). Toddlers love charity as it allows them to appear altruistic as they breed the dependency and suffering they aim to exploit.

The Bystander Effect Is a Lie.

The researchers may not have intended to disprove Bystander Effect, but they did. It's not that humans are confused or victims of group-think or uncertain conformists; they're just evil little vermin looking for opportunity to advantage.

They're too stupid not to shoot themselves in the foot, of course; bunch of petty, sniveling, authoritarian scum sucking up to Power imagining they're shrewd and crafty. This species is a write-off.