Rape Culture in India

The Hindu: Rape Accused Cannot Insist on Subjecting Victim to DNA Test

The facts:

• Consensual sex "on many occasions".

The circumstances:

• If she wasn't having sex with multiple partners, she would have no reason to refuse DNA testing.
• She claims she had no interest in sex (this is a biological lie) and only "submitted to the lust of the accused" on many occasions because he promised marriage (it's possible he lied to get her to do what woman want to do a great deal more than men biologically could).
• He claims she is being coerced by her parents to say he promised to marry her (highly likely as mothers slut-shame their daughters to perpetuate the demented lie that rests on the imbecilic premise that the genes of women averse to reproductive activity were promoted by Natural Selection over the genes of women obsessed with sex).

So the entire case is an utter farce with the implausibly ridiculous offences ("making a woman pregnant by false promise", "rape by deception") legislated by the bio-political State exploiting the cultural lies of slut-shamed women abused by their abused mothers who were abused as girls, and so on.

I couldn't find out what happened to this poor bastard but the injustice wrought by this demented biological lie generated the need that destroyed the entire world. What could go wrong?

Foul Play Suspected by the Usual Suspects

Suicide is stigmatised but martyrdom is glamorised. Euthanasia is stigmatised but terror is sensationalised. I can't live in a world where children come to die.

The Wisdom of King Solomon

You could count the stories worth reading in the Bible on one hand, but The Wisdom of King Solomon ( 1 Kings 3:16-27 ) is one of them.

The story goes like this:

Two women come before King Solomon to settle a maternity dispute over a baby they each claim to be the mother of. What happened was they were living in a house together as harlots when they both gave birth to boys around the same time. 

One night, one of the mothers killed her baby by rolling over it in her sleep. For reasons that aren't fully explained, she simply got up and stole the other woman's baby to replace her dead one. The mother of the living baby woke up, freaked out and then realised what had happened.

The kidnapper denied stealing the baby, of course; so the two women were trapped in a classic "She said, she said" situation and these were the days before DNA tests so King Solomon is like, "This is bullshit. I don't have time for this. Take a sword, chop the baby in two and give half to each one." 

He's a busy King, he doesn't have all day to listen to women who are professional liars accuse each other of lying. 

A soldier pulls out his sword as commanded and grabs the baby, at which point one of the two women cries out in horror, "No, don't kill my baby. Give it to her." And King Solomon, wise as an owl, is like, "Aha! That's the real mother right there," because the other woman was all like, "Yeah, chop it up. Fair is fair."

In Polite Society, Everyone is Rude.

The word "bossy" implies women need better communication skills. Men who are "bossy" get smacked in the kisser but no one will ever smack her. It's in her interests to handle her own smacking. No one likes an antisocial bully.

I don't know why my comment below was censored but it's a really good comment. It might be obvious stuff but in a world this detached from reality, if you're not stating obvious truths repetitively, you probably shouldn't be stating anything at all.

"If you have nothing true to say, then don't say anything at all."

- mothers (in Civil Society) 

Sorry Always Seems the Rudest Word

Rather than struggling to say the word "Sorry", you could try:
a) not being malicious, and
b) compensating those who have been disadvantaged by your actions. 

This is a world of selfless leeches who imagine there is value in their promises when all they do is lie. They imagine there is value in their expressed feelings when their emotions are false. They imagine there is value in conversation limited to small talk. They imagine there is value in their digital images which have been manipulated to the point where they no longer serve as an accurate representation of their cosmetic appearance or their actual appearance, in reality.

Objectified women divide by zero and try to sell [doing what they want to do] as a service to men. They've sucked all meaning out of life with their fraud, illusions, misrepresentation, concealment, deception and denial. They fall for illusions created by their own fabricated illusions, i.e. when they value the 100 Likes of a manipulated image they upload to Facebook. They imagine 100 people approve of them and they get an virtual attitude. But when the picture looks nothing like them, 100 people click Like not because they like the fraud but as victims of fraud. The girls cannot be made to understand that 100 people weren't actually impressed, they merely appeared to be. They've been deceived by fantasy misrepresented as reality. No one is impressed when the truth is revealed. Fantasy is worthless in reality, but women disagree. Try as you might, you will never be able to make yourself exist in the delusions of an objectified woman's positive thinking. We are stuck in this surreal reality, made horrifying by the aversion of abuse victims to objective reality, honesty, biology and truth.

This is the kind of insanity I am drowning in. If you cannot see it, that's very unfortunate for us
both. In this example, the girl immediately understood only for some nitwit imbecile to 'correct' my
irrefutable logic. Who defines values, definitions, meanings? Who had first access to your mind?

This complexity is all too much for face-painted objects concealing their true worth. They lie to impress, too stupid to realise that deceit isn't valued, it appears to be. You can only lie to impress your mother. In the real world, anyone you impress with your lies won't be, it's merely an illusion (impressing) created by your illusion (lying to impress).

There is no intrinsic value in spoken words or expressed feelings. Saying "Sorry" is intrinsically worthless. Habitual apologists value the illusion (appreciation of the signified intent to make up for wrongdoing or compensate for damages) created by their own illusion (stated apology, expressing remorse). Without the intent and capacity to compensate your victims, "Sorry" isn't the hardest but the rudest word to say.

But how many mothers would have a mind functional enough to comprehend the value of saying "Sorry"? 5 in 100? 1 in 100? It's a sad, sad situation. 

"Sorry."

The People are Tyrants

This species is shrewdly cannibalising itself because mothers reduce children into frightened, narcissistic conformists. Everyone just follows the crowd, miserable lemmings going over the cliff. It's pathetic. Maybe 1% of humans are humane, but one in 100 isn't enough. Not even 10% or 20% would be, so there's no point in doing anything (not to be confused with continuing to be malicious, I'm talking about activism). 

Action intended to deactivate the Machine might be the only activism that isn't evil. I'm a big fan of Médecins sans Frontières but I cannot see how the logical case can be made for the virtue in assisting or enabling anyone to bring life to a world of death. 

This world is going the other way. It's gone.

3 years for $3 billion fraud.

15 years for $100 theft for food.

Most Women Aren't Old Enough For Sex